Elesa
Knowles
Dr.
Juniper Ellis
Travel
Literature
May
5, 2015
The
Loyola Honor Code governs the exam, like all work in this course. Before you take the exam please sign the
Honor Code pledge. Cut and paste the
following statement at the beginning of your exam:
I attest, in keeping with
the Loyola Honor Code, that all work on the exam is my own; I am writing it
right now without reference to any pre-existing notes, books, or electronic
resources. Signed, [Elesa Knowles]
How
does a traveler find healing or reconciliation, no matter what the
circumstances? And what does that tell
you about the traveler and the circumstances?
Discuss all works since the mid-semester exam, and include literary
form.
Despair is contagious is the belief
of many a people who endure hardship, forcible change, and immerse prejudice in
the early and late 20th century. In the era of Post-Colonialism, a
collection of people and bodies of land have emerged from out of the shadows of
their colonizer’s influence and beliefs. Although the acts of oppression have
passed, the despair induced from inheriting a legacy of violence and
self-loathing exists. In awesome turn of events, this despair brings about the
greatest hope in the present and future. A traveler who voyages through despair
to discover hope is similar to how many authors and narrator find healing and
reconciliation regardless of the circumstances in many stories of tattoo,
Oceania, and Caribbean literature. This progressive pattern shows the universal
spirit to live and thrive on Earth as well as not merely to survive and mourn
eternally on earth. This pattern can be highlighted in particular in the texts
of Wendt’s “The Cross of Soot”, Danticat’s “Kirk? Krak?” and Spiegelman’s “Maus
II”. This pattern of hope springing out of despair through the means of travel
can be seen echoed throughout Hauo’fa “Our Sea of Islands”, Wendt’s “Tattauting
the Post-Colonial Body, O’ Connor’s “Parker’s Back”, and Kerouac’s “On the
Road”.
A boy travels into a prison system
and literally is confronted and befriends despair in the forms of human chained
for murder and rape. This eight-year-old amidst the chaos is treated well by
the men who do not take advantage of his ignorance. One of the prisoners
regardless of being imprisoned chooses to define his circumstances through own
skin. He is a tattooist. When the boy asks him for a tattoo of a star, he
decides to mark the child with this optimist symbol of a star, a fleeting yet
intense light on the hand, to convey their new founded friendship. His parents
summon the boy; thus, the tattoo remains unfinished. Most of the prisoners see
this act as a marker of their relationship. A prisoner and a child would have a
dis-connect, but when they try to create something together it ends up a
disaster. When the boy’s mothers see the tattoo, her reaction is a beautiful
disaster. The unfinished light star is the outline of a cross. In the context
of Judean-Christian, the cross a unifying symbol of life over death. A boy
leapt into a prison of despair and climbed under the gate into his unlocked
home with hope tattooed upon his hand for all to see.
In Danticat’s works, one story of a
mother and wife’s response to despair is “A Wall of Fire’. His husband and
father commits suicide in the Haitian community publicly by filling up a hot
air balloon and jumping out in front of his son. His son’s play was highlighting
the hypocrisy of the current regime in Haitian nation in particular its
relative freedom amidst the violence of the Dominican Republic and Haiti. In
spite of being proud of his son’s accomplishments, the fathers sees his own
son’s educational success not as an extension of himself but rather his son’s
success in a limited sphere as his own failure as a man and provider. He then
takes his son’s lines from the play literally and decides to die in fires
rather taste freedom. His wife’s response was to protect his son but she does
not abandon or disown his husband’s body. She maturely asks his son to come
with her to reclaim the body. In addition, she could have pretended she did not
know him and grieve privately. Instead of avoiding the despair of the
situation, she confronts it and seeks the hope of letting her husband’s life
not a single act define him. She tells the police and hospital official to let
him have his eyes open because he always wanted to be looking at the sky. She
acknowledges his despair that consumed her husband but is not absorbed into it.
She walks through her own home that has become the jury and executer of her
husband and travels to the place of understanding as the healer seeing the hope
admits the chaos.
Spiegelman’s “Maus II” sees the
despair traveling from family member to family member. Art, the son, asks his
father about the most despair-inducing event of the early 20th
century and sees oblivious resistance. The father in spite of having his wife
commit suicide, after her brother who was a Holocaust survivor dies of natural
causes, continues to witness the Holocaust for his son who is stained by the
despair of the past. The father in his means of speech and interview sees hope.
Even in the car rides to the Shop Rite he sees the hanging bodies of the girls
from the camp, he still smiles and jokes over 50 cents over Special K cereal.
He does not focus on his past and even stops his son from poking too much. In
the comic cut away scenes, he focuses on his love of his wife and not once
brings up her suicide as an excuse for not enjoying the world he lives in the
United States. He could have focused on the Nazis that tortured him or the
people who disowned him during the war, but he focuses on facts and being
re-uniting with his family. He celebrates the world and he remembers seeking
letters to his wife, receiving letter from his wife and rejoicing, and his
final memory conveyed to his son is that of re-uniting with his wife. The last
page is father and mother being side by side unified through the hope of their
son created after the despair of the war to preserve this legacy to create a
beautiful not a disastrous world after the Holocaust.
The literary motif of hope through travel is
highlighted through the perspective of the narrators. The narrators in all the
stories chose to focus on the positive and see the forcible travel or
restricted circumstances induced by war, poverty, and systematic oppression. The
travelling in the mind is chosen while the physical travel is enforced upon
them. Likewise in Hauo’fa “Our Sea of Islands”, the narrator could have viewed
the insulting logic of little islands in the sea as simply diminutive. He could
have been consumed by the hatred and despaired over the forced illogic of the
rhetoric of Eurocentric powers. In instead, he utilized his environment
rhetoric and transformed it into a great critique and praise of Oceania’s
legacy of hope and courage in the context of entire world not just Europe. He
did this so well that this article’s hope triumphing over despairing insults
travelled all the way to Baltimore in North America in the Unite States, which
is an impressive feat for “non-influential islands in the sea”. In Wendt’s “Tattooing the Post-Colonial Body”,
challenges the rhetoric of tattoos of being modern graffiti and being
rebellious. The narrator focuses on the positive communal culture of tattooing
opposed to the trendy representation. The
narrator does allow the Samoan literature legacy to be forgotten in O’ Connor’s
“Parker’s Back” or Kerouac’s “On the Road” texts. O’ Connor invokes the
communal Judea-Christian context of Jesus’s eyes and travelling on a person’s
skin. However in O’Connor’s context the unifying aspect is not understood by
the wife of Parker compared to boy’s mother in Wendt’s “Cross of Soot”. Even in
American road trip word surfing format of Kerouac, the narrator seeks hope in
the intoxicating pattern of travel. This chosen travel in spite of it being
engrossed in drugs, sex with random partners, and violence is for the hope of
adventure and understanding. Most narrators did not choose their circumstances
but choose how they react thus their travel resulted in healing or
reconciliation with the exception of the narrator of “On the Road”. Despair is
contagious; on the other hand, with help of travel internally or personal
decisions, hope is contagious in most of all circumstances that absorbs most of
despair of any singular event.